…media to run governance session…
It has just been revealed that the “2020 ideas for the future summit” in April will consider whether Australia should become a republic. We now have an idea how this summit will operate. And it’s not pretty. It's looking as if it may end up like the Supreme Soviet – one sided.
John Hartigan, executive chairman of News Limited, is to chair the crucially important governance session.
Becoming a republic is put in the context of “cutting our ties with Britain” which is of course an entirely different question. Don’t the organisers know all legal authority of the UK in Australia only lasted as long as we wanted it and was ended when the politicians finally worked out what they wanted in 1986?
Don’t they know the High Court ruled in 1999 that the Australian Crown is an entirely separate legal institution from the British Crown?
Apart from becoming a republic the session will have a daunting agenda to complete in just two days. This will include whether we should have a bill of rights; “what levels of transparency good government demands,” especially in government dealings with the media; and the impact of freedom of information laws.
It seems the governance session is to be run by the media. When the government realised it was being politically incorrect and had forgotten about the dated baby boomer issue of gender balance, the former ABC television presenter Maxine McKew MP was added as co-chair.
…call to journlists to stop playing politics…
Inconveniently, News Limited’s flagship The Australian ( 15 March 2005 “Detachment Matters”) recently called on journalists to stop playing politics and to get out of the political arena.
Day has seized on this and says Hartigan should have refused Kevin Rudd’s invitation. ( The Australian 20 March 2008 “My boss shouldn't be involved with Rudd's gabfest” ) .
Some more traditional journalists take the view that they should not belong to political organisations. Day says he has “long” argued that journalists should not be joiners, but admits he did not always hold this view.
He changed his mind when he was on Australian Republican Movement’s executive. It all became clear when he argued in The Daily Telegraph in 1998 that the ARM needed new leadership “less abrasive” than Malcolm Turnbull’s. He was forced off the executive and “nearly drummed out” of the ARM.
Day misses the point.
It’s not so much about joining. It’s about being objective about the facts and declaring any conflicts of interest unknown to readers.
Recently he failed to declare his republican affiliations when he made his extraordinary claim that the Royal Family leaked the story that Prince Harry was in Afghanistan.
He later backed away from his line that this was based on observing how the Royal Family manipulates the media, and claimed the story was based on…yes, “impeccable sources.”
…shades of the Supreme Soviet…
We now know the details of one of the most important sessions at the Summit.
One thing is likely. There’ll probably be no one there speaking for those who voted no in 1999. They won in all states, 55% of the popular vote and 72% of electorates. Only on side is likely to be there.
Paul Keating appointed the 2020 summit co-chairman Professor Glyn Davis a member of the 1993 Republic Advisory Committee chaired by Malcolm Turnbull. Keating had made it a strict condition that all members, without exception, be committed republicans, so everyone knows where Davis stands.
Of course, he’s entitled to be a republican. Its his modus operandi which is interesting.
In 2002, when he was vice-chancellor of Griffith University, the university The Australian and the ARM, convened the “Australian Constitutional Futures Conference.” This was to restart and broaden the debate about “the” republic and the constitutional framework “we” need for the 21st century.
Although this conference was hosted by a taxpayer funded university, no one who was not a committed republican was invited to speak.
Davis gave a paper on republicanism rising again. The conference papers are no longer accessible on the Griffith University site. No wonder.
One speaker ( Greg Barns) referred to the monarchy as “rancid” and “corrupt,” “a menace to democracy” with “ a cavalier disregard for liberal values,” a ” corrupt institution … prepared to subvert the rule of law… and allow criminal activity to go unchecked within its walls.”
The monarchy, he said, has “little interest in anything other than self-preservation and that it will ride roughshod over the rule of law, if necessary, to achieve that aim.”
Neither the University nor The Australian invited a contribution from the other side, those whose views , after all, prevailed in 1999.
So will this be how each of the sessions at the summit will operate? Entirely one sided? If so they needn’t bother.
They could publish the conclusions now.
The 2020 summit is looking as if it will be as predictable as a meeting of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR.
They could go the whole hog. When Stalin concluded a speech, the record would invariably say
[ An edited version of this was included in the 20 March 2008 edition of the online journal, Crikey]
Summit to rule on republic: only one view to be permitted?